Posts Tagged With: preaching

The Biggest Obstacle to Faith in Christ the Savior

Amid the rampant unbelief in the world, one often hears people putting up roadblocks and obstacles by describing that which keeps them from believing the good news of reconciliation with the Creator through Jesus Christ.  The most common objections verbalized tend to be along the lines that evidence is lacking for God, for the integrity and truth of the Bible, that the morality revealed in Scripture is outdated, or that the Bible’s record on such things as creation is contradicted by modern science.   But as we know from human experience, things are not always as they appear when it comes to people saying why they do not accept something.  People are prone to not indicate the real obstacle that prevents them from coming to Christ.

Would it surprise you to know that the biggest obstacle to people’s acceptance of the gospel of Jesus Christ today is not a lack of evidence, but self-righteous pride?  The Bible humbles the pride of man.  It describes him not as righteous, but as ungodly, unholy, evil, undesirable, and unworthy of any consideration or favor from the Creator.  According to the Scriptures, the good news is that God has offered eternal blessing in Christ to those who only deserve His eternal curse and punishment in hell forever.

Romans 3

10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:

11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.

12 They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.

13 Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:

14 Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness:

15 Their feet are swift to shed blood:

16 Destruction and misery are in their ways:

17 And the way of peace have they not known:

18 There is no fear of God before their eyes.

19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.

People just cannot accept the picture that God paints of them in Scripture.  They are offended by what He says about them in His word: that they are vile, corrupt, and worthy only to be cast into hell forever.  That is the biggest obstacle that the average person has to receiving Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.  It is pride.  It is an unwillingness to accept that they are as worthless as God says they are.  For it is only those who recognize their need as sinners, and their utter inability to help themselves or to do anything pleasing to the Creator, which makes them ready to receive the free gift of salvation in Jesus Christ the Savior.  The world’s biggest obstacle to receiving the gospel is not a lack of evidence for God or the Bible; It is the pride of humans who think they are good people.

400px-2010_OldSouth_Boston_4602722461

Old South Church, Boston

Ebenezer Pemberton, a Congregational minister who served as the pastor of the Old South Church, Boston from 1700-1717, puts it this way,

“The freedom and riches of divine grace to the greatest of sinners is an essential part of the glory that is displayed in the gospel.  But we are naturally slow of heart to believe; a self-righteous spirit appears in a variety of forms to obstruct our approaches to God through Jesus Christ*.”

Thanks be to God that for those of us who have embraced Christ when we heard the gospel, the Lord subdued our self-righteous pride and stubborn will, informing us of our miserable condition, making us willing and able to receive Him as He was offered to us as Savior.

*Ebenezer Pemberton, Don Kistler, ed., The Puritan Pulpit, Orlando, FL: Soli Deo Gloria Publications, 2006, p. 207.

Categories: Doctrine | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Preaching from the Old Testament

IMG_6767In the New Testament, the apostles and prophets proclaimed Christ (His person and work) from the existing canon of Scripture that they had, that is, from the Old Testament.  Based on their examples, we find several ways or methods to preach from the Old Testament.  Although in recent years there has been quite a bit of attention given in some circles to redemptive historical preaching, this hermeneutical method is only one of several methods of interpretation which ought to be applied to a given Old Testament passage.

Several important hermeneutics are listed as follows, with an example for each from Genesis 30*.

1. Redemptive-Historical — This method looks for cues to the progressive unfolding of God’s plan through human history.

Example: God caused Jacob’s favorite and beloved wife, Rachel, to have a son, named Joseph, whom he would love more than his brothers.  This was a part of the unfolding of God’s plan to save the family of Jacob from extinction in the great famine that would take place  years later when Joseph was prime minister of Egypt, after his brothers had sold him into slavery in jealousy, but God raised him to great status in Egypt.  Through this temporal salvation that God worked through Joseph, the nation of Israel was kept alive so that the Messiah would eventually spring of him.

2. Promise-Fulfillment — This method highlights specific and explicit prophecies God gave in the Old Testament that would come to pass in the time of the New Testament.

Example:  We see in the prospering of Jacob’s herds, and the diminishing of Laban’s herds, of a man who abused Jacob, the fulfillment of God’s promise to Jacobs’ grandfather Abraham, to bless him, bless those who bless him, and curse those who curse him.  This promise ultimately has reference to Abraham’s and Jacob’s Seed, who is Christ.  (Gal 3:16)

3. Typological — Looks for symbols in the characters and events of Old Testament narrative that point to something greater to come.

Example: The 12 patriarchs born of Leah, Rachel, Bilhah, and Zilpah, are a type of the 12 apostles that Jesus would set apart as the formative structure for His kingdom on earth, the Church of Jesus Christ, which is the New Israel.  (Acts 1:6-8)

4. Analogical — Analogical preaching uses a narrative to illustrate a doctrine of Scripture.  There is a danger here, since it is rarely the clear intent of a passage to provide an analogy to help explain a broader teaching.  Yet we find examples of such application in the New Testament, like with Paul’s analogy in Galatians using Hagar and Sarah to represent the law and the gospel.  While certainly not the first hermeneutic to bring to a narrative passage, it may have a place, as a method of instruction on a core New Testament doctrine.

Example:  The miraculous increase of Jacob’s herds and decrease of Laban’s herds are a picture of God’s sovereign building of His Church.  He builds one flock and diminishes another, by a secret and spiritual operation, according to His sovereign purpose, because, after all, it is He who builds her. (Matthew 16:18)

5. Moral Exemplar — Christ teaches Christians by His Word, how to live in a way that pleases Him, and His work of sanctification in us produces these fruits in us.  We see these fruits sometimes abounding, sometimes lacking, in the examples of people in the Old Testament.  From them we can learn to follow their good examples and avoid their bad examples.

Example:  It is the will of Christ, and His teaching, that a husband ought to be joined to one wife.  We see the example of Jacob, and the miserable strife and bitter rivalry that polygamy caused in his family.  This is an indication that polygamy is contrary to God’s moral will.  (1 Tim 3:2)

As the apostles did, and as the greatest preachers of Church History since apostolic times (Gregory Nazianzus, Chrysostom, Luther, Calvin, Spurgeon, etc.) have demonstrated, it is fitting and necessary to preach from the Old Testament in the Church of Jesus Christ.  Preaching from the Old Testament gives the people of God a balanced diet of the Word, and it is the will of God who gave 66 books of Scripture and not merely 27.  The discerning preacher-exegete will attempt to use all of these various methods whenever they seem to carry significant weight in a particular pericope, taken in context with the whole of Scripture.  He will make sure to give his hearers a balance of approaches by which Christ is seen to be proclaimed in the Old Testament.  Contrary to the claims of some, the redemptive historical hermeneutic is only one of several important methods of interpreting the Old Testament in Christ-centered way.

*For some of the categories represented in this post and line of thought followed, I am indebted to Sidney Greidanus, Preaching Christ From The Old Testament.

Categories: Bible, The Ministry | Tags: , , | 2 Comments

Many are induced…

Many are induced by pride and presumption, by disdain, or by envy to persuade themselves that they will get enough benefit from reading in private, or meditating in private. By doing so, they contemn the public assemblies, and think that meditation there is unnecessary. But because they dissolve or divide, as much as is in them, the bond of unity which God wills to be kept inviolable, it is fitting that they receive the reward of such a divorce, for they bewitch themselves of all the errors and reveries which carry them to confusion.

Jean Calvin, L’Institution Chrétienne, IV.I.5

Categories: The Church, The Ministry | Tags: , , , | Leave a comment

William Edward’s Preaching vs. That of The Dissenters

[William Edward of Rhyd-y-gele] was full of fire and passion, was very gifted, and possessed the ability to address sinners, but was naturally awkward and uncultivated in his manner.  He was a Methodist, he had been converted under Howell Harris, but had mixed much amongst the Dissenters and when attending their special services sat with their ministers.  They considered him too fiery and irregular.  He thought them lifeless and unevangelical.  He explained to them once the difference between his way of preaching and theirs, using the illustration of a house on fire:

Image

“Your way is to say, ‘On travelling one night, firstly, I perceived a fire.  Secondly I saw smoke.  Thirdly, I understood that a house was on fire.  Fourthly, I knew that the family inside were asleep.  Fifthly, I came to wake you and to call you, in case you were destroyed.’  My own method, on seeing the house aflame and the family asleep, is to shout out, with no firstly or secondly, ‘Hey!  Hey!  Fire!  Fire!  Awake!  Come out at once or  you will be burnt to ashes!'”

Jones & Morgan, The Calvinistic Methodist Fathers of Wales, (The Banner of Truth Trust), vol. I, p. 346.

Categories: History, The Ministry | Tags: , , , | Leave a comment

The Light of the Gospel Shines Where the Darkness is Clearly Felt

HowellHarrisThe predominant effect that [Howell] Harris’s preaching produced was terror. As he mentioned himself, his main theme was the misery of those without Christ and the pronouncement of doom upon idlers and frequenters of the games and revels. As a result, these traditional pastimes that had reigned for centuries were overthrown, nor have they yet been able to raise their heads again. The influence produced by Harris’s preaching was experienced by a fifteen-year-old youth, the son of a man called Sion Griffith. He came quite thoughtlessly to the meeting only because he was curious. But an arrow entered his heart and for all his efforts he could not shake free of it. His turmoil increased. The agony of his heart bordered on insanity, until at last he determined to put an end to himself by throwing himself into the sea, in that to continue to live would only multiply his sins and increase his punishment. But while walking towards the cliffs, the words, “Son, be of good cheer, Thy sins are forgiven thee,” came forcibly into his mind. Such was the light that shone upon him that he fell to the ground. Having recovered, he sought to convince himself that the word was not for him, but the attempt was in vain, and before rising to his feet he had committed himself to the Saviour’s care. Everything that he saw around him seemed to be clothed with a new light. No doubt he was typical of many others.

Jones & Morgan, The Calvinistic Methodist Fathers of Wales, vol I, p. 169

Categories: History | Tags: , , | 1 Comment

Many families, …

Many families, considered to be of the gentry of the area, were also won to the ranks of the Methodists. Squire Jones, of Fonmon Castle, was convicted when listening to Howell Harris preaching at Aberthaw. Mr. Jones had gone there together with some other gentry, a drawn sword in his hand, with the intention of frustrating the meeting. The speaker was not in any way intimidated by him, he rather asked the people to divide and make a way for the party and he himself turned to English so that they could understand. The squire’s horse got stuck in the mud so that it could not move, and the rider was forced unwillingly to listen to God’s Word. But an arrow shot home. He removed his hat, to show respect, he opened his heart to receive the gospel; and he returned to his castle with the preacher by his side. He raised a pulpit in his house for the benefit of the speakers, and his mansion immediately became a home for the Reformers on their journeys. Preaching took place there regularly throughout the Squire’s life and for years afterward. This is where Whitefield stayed when in the vicinity.

Jones & Morgan, The Calvinistic Methodist Fathers of Wales, vol. I p. 130

Categories: History | Tags: , | 2 Comments

Go to the eighteenth century!

whitefieldGo to the eighteenth century!  In other words read the stories of the great tides and movements of the Spirit experienced in that century.  It is the most exhilarating experience, the finest tonic you will ever know.  For a preacher it is absolutely invaluable…There is nothing more important for preaching than reading Church history and biographies.

–Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones

Categories: History, The Ministry | Tags: , | Leave a comment

The Word is Central

If you ask church leaders today what is the central act of worship, most would say praise music; a few would say, Holy Communion. But in heaven it is not the praises of God’s people, or of the angels which are central, not the saints’ communion with Him or with one another, but it is the Word who is the center of all.

Dr. Martin Lloyd-Jones preaching at Westminster Chapel, London, England.

Dr. Martin Lloyd-Jones preaching at Westminster Chapel, London, England.

Revelation 21:22-23 (KJV)

22 And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it.

23 And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof.

Categories: The Church, The Ministry | Tags: , , | Leave a comment

The Holy Spirit Giving Authoritative Confidence in God’s Word to the Preacher

What is true of the ordinary believer respecting his confidence that his Bible is the Word of God comes in a heightened way to the preacher in the act of preaching by the ministry of the Holy Spirit.  If you are a preacher, surely you have felt as I have many times while preaching the Word of God that you stood forty feet tall with a sword ten feet long and six inches wide.  You felt that you could take on anyone and anything with that ‘sword of the Spirit.’  Now this sense of the absolute authority of the Word of God is not a qualitatively different different conviction concerning the Scriptures–a difference in kind from that with which you entered the pulpit.  Rather, it is a heightened persuasion that, in turn, gives a note of unanswerable authority to your preaching.  Since our preaching deals with God’s revealed truth, should we not expect the “Spirit of truth” to be unusually active and present as we preach, attesting to our own hearts with power that His Word is indeed truth?

from Preaching in the Holy Spirit by Albert N. Martin, p. 36

Categories: The Ministry | Tags: , | Leave a comment

Valuable Insights from “The Forgotten Spurgeon” by Iain H. Murray with personal reflections

by Riley Fraas

Of all the great preachers and theologians in the hall of Church History, few are as broadly appreciated, read as far and wide still in our present day as Charles H. Spurgeon. Revered throughout evangelicalism as a preacher and evangelist, the preacher at the London Metropolitan Tabernacle exemplified the heavenly gift through his wit, his understanding and application of the human condition, his pointed focus, and soundness to the teaching of Scripture. I personally remember seeing his works in the bookstore at a large charismatic megachurch that I attended many, many years ago. That Spurgeon is still read so broadly is a testament to his staying power and appeal. In this book by the distinguished historian Iain H. Murray first published in 1966, Murray’s book focuses attention on episodes in Spurgeons life ministry which, according to Murray, had received short shrift in previous biographies and works on Spurgeon.

Murray’s premise is that Spurgeon’s role in doctrinal controversies has been downplayed because those who had hitherto written about him did not share the beliefs that he fought for in those instances of his ministry. They tend to either describe his involvement in doctrinal controversy as out of character, an aberration, or a forgivable flaw in context with all the “good” produced by him in contrast to the controversies, like winning the lost. Spurgeon’s response during times of controversy usually came in the form of sermons preached during the times of the controversies. Murray’s thesis seems plausible to me, though I must admit that I have never read any of the biographies of Spurgeon that he cites. Due to the efforts of Murray and others, I have a hunch that Spurgeon’s distinctive theology which sets him apart from much of what passes for modern evangelicalism, that is, his adherance to the teachings of the Puritans and Reformed soteriology are now better known than they were fifty years ago. That is, in my judgment Spurgeon is probably more widely recognized as a Calvinist today than he once was. But I decided to write this review because I think Murray’s book offers insightful thoughts from Spurgeon on many practical things which are still confronting ministers of the gospel today. My intention is not to write a comprehensive book review summarizing all the details in every chapter of the book, but to highlight insights which I find engage me in my current context, and hopefully others will benefit from them as well. I will stick to Murray’s book and will not be quoting any other works. I will use the term “Calvinism” to represent a soteriology which holds that salvation is unconditionally of the Lord from start to finish, which is the way in which Spurgeon embraced and used the label.

  1. The Preacher in Park Street

It is commonly thought in evangelical circles that Calvinist preaching does not appeal to the masses. If it can cause growth anywhere, it would seem to be only among the most intellectual and rationally educated demographic like university students, software engineers and physics teachers, or maybe in certain ethnic communities where people have been raised on it. According to this thinking, industrialized South London was no place where Calvinism should flourish, humanly speaking. Yet despite all of these human factors, Spurgeon’s ministry, particularly known for its bold exposition of the doctrines of grace from Scripture, flourished among factory workers, housekeepers, and chimney-sweeps. What a testimony this is to God’s grace! Doesn’t this sound a lot like the God we read about in the first chapter of Corinthians, who has chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise? And my own limited experience confirms that it is often the most humble of station that are best prepared to embrace a Sovereign God who works all things according to the counsel of his will. (Ephesians 1:11) Many of the people I’ve known in churches where the doctrines of grace were taught have been truck drivers, welders, municipal workers, or nurses. The example of the success of Spurgeon’s ministry in hardscrabble South London ought to serve as an example and encouragement to us preachers who are committed to the same doctrines that he professed. We base our hope for growth and discipleship not on the education or intellectual powers of the hearers, but only on the grace of God and the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit on the mind of the redeemed sinner. Murray also notes that Spurgeon was more noted for specifically preaching on the doctrines of grace earlier in his ministry, but that later in life, he widened his field, so to speak, by preaching on other topics more frequently without changing his position on the sovereign grace of God which saves. (35) Probably this is a growth cycle that many Calvinistic preachers go through as they mature and come to a greater understanding of the Scriptures. Over time, they come to understand the Scriptures better, so they find more doctrines and topics in each passage to address in preaching. The effect is a greater variety.

  1. The Lost Controversy

Spurgeon’s first major controversy arose through criticism from those Murray calls “Hyper-Calvinists”, who through peculiar attempts at logical resolution denied the free offer of the gospel to all hearers. It seems that Spurgeon had not yet come under the widespread attention of the larger Arminian camp which preached “free will” in opposition to Calvinism, but he had managed to arouse the ire of Hyper-Calvinists by the freeness with which he offered Christ crucified to all sinners who heard him. Actually, (as Murray notes,) Hyper-Calvinism is a misnomer because it disagrees with Calvin who clearly articulated and preached the free offer of the gospel.

According to Spurgeon, Hyper-Calvinists were guilty of not preaching the gospel to sinners as our Lord commanded, since Hyper-Calvinism preaches the gospel only to those who are sensible and conscious of their sinfulness, not to the dead and indifferent. The biblical way is to offer the gospel to senseless sinners, not sensible sinners on whom God has already been working. Spurgeon said of their preaching,

I do not believe in the way in which some people pretend to preach the gospel. They have no gospel for sinners as sinners, but only for those who are above the dead level of sinnership, and are technically styled ‘sensible’ sinners.” (Murray, 49.)

The problem with the Hyper-Calvinist approach is that those who are truly touched savingly by God’s grace are the last ones who will consider themselves to be fully convinced or sensible of their condition. The awakened sinner only sees his wretchedness and misery, not his awakened state. Therefore, he will assume that the message of reconciliation preached to those who sense their sinfulness is not for him, since his senses do not even begin to plumb the depths of how truly sinful he is, he thinks. On the other hand, when the only requirement for receiving the gospel is that one be a sinner and rebel against God deserving of eternal hell, not necessarily one on whom the Holy Spirit is working, then the truly awakened will perceive that this is a message for them, and that Christ is truly offered to be their Savior.

Ironically, where the Hyper-Calvinists fall short on this point is at the same point where the Arminians fall short. By requiring that the hearer be in some sense prepared mentally and spiritually first in order for the good news of Christ’s death and resurrection to then be applied to him by the preacher, they were implying that the power of Christ’s atonement did not extend itself to the unbelief and hardened obstinacy of those for whom he died, but that something else is required before this atonement may be applied to sinners in preaching. In contrast, biblical Calvinism recognizes that it was not for the awakened and spiritually concerned that Christ died, but for hardened sinners and enemies of God, even for the very people who crucified him. In this way only the Calvinist message based on Scriptural teaching that Christ died to save to the uttermost all His elect is actually able to freely offer the gospel to all hearers. Hyper-Calvinism, then, with its offer of salvation limited to those who were already showing signs of being elect, falls short of a true representation of Calvinism, and more importantly, of Christ’s atonement as revealed in Scripture, because it does not offer Christ to hardened sinners.

Calvinists are precisely those who believe that hardened sinners are saved by grace in their state of spiritual death in keeping with Ephesians 2:4-5, But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, If we are to be true to our beliefs, we must present the good news of reconciliation with God to the worst sinners imaginable in our preaching, that is, to those who are entirely unawakened and unenlightened, who are completely numb in a deathly stupor. This point hit me when I read Murray’s book. I began to feel convicted about one recent sermon in particular, at a wedding, when I recall having said something to the effect that “if the Holy Spirit is drawing you, then embrace Christ the Savior and be saved by him.” Although my intent was to be true to God’s sovereignty in salvation in the way that I presented the gospel, I am now of the opinion that I was being hyper-calvinistic in this type of appeal, as if Christ were not freely offered to those on whom the Spirit has not begun to work. But perhaps the more weighty consideration is that those on whom the Spirit is working will not be cognizant of the fact at that point in time, and that by putting in the description that those who should come are those who are being drawn by Him, I may cause certain hearers to exclude themselves from the invitation, namely those who are most sensible of their sinfulness! I am thankful to Spurgeon and Murray for helping to bring to my attention a serious flaw in my preaching. If I truly believe that salvation is of grace alone, as a good Calvinist, then I cannot fail to freely offer forgiveness of sins and eternal life to those who are completely dead in their sins and without any taste for the things of God, in the way that God has appointed, that is, upon condition of faith in Christ.

  1. Arminianism against Scripture

Spurgeon held that Arminianism does not merely affect a few doctrines which can be separated from the gospel, rather it involves the whole unity of biblical revelation and it affects our view of the whole plan of redemption at almost every point.” (Murray, 74)

It’s hard to argue with Spurgeon’s position that Arminianism destroys the coherance of the biblical plan of redemption. The whole biblical plan of salvation fails if just one link in the golden chain of salvation found in Romans 8:29, 30:

For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.

But even more than messing up the plan of salvation revealed in Scripture, Spurgeon believed that Arminianism had dire consequences for the preaching of the free offer of the gospel itself. Murray writes, “[Spurgeon] held that if the Arminian position were true he would have no real redemption that he could preach, because it would throw the message of the gospel into confusion. (77)

The gospel of reconciliation with God through Christ is of course given within the context of the fuller sweep of biblical revelation. But even more than that, Arminianism, according to Spurgeon, undermines salvation itself. By teaching that not everyone for whom Christ died will be saved, Arminianism ends up holding forth a general atonement intended for everyone in general but no one in particular. That is to say, according to Arminian teaching, Jesus did not really die for anyone. Spurgeon says,

The Arminian holds that Christ, when he died, did not die with an intent to save any particular person; and they teach that Christ’s death does not in itself secure, beyond a doubt, the salvation of any one man living…We say that Christ so died that he infallibly secured the salvation of a multitude that no man can number, who through Christ’s death not only may be saved, but are saved, must be saved, and cannot by any possibility run the hazard of being anything but saved.” (82)

To the Calvinist preacher of the gospel, it is a comfort to know that he has a full, real, specific, and particular atoning sacrifice to preach to all men in general. Because Christ died to save a particular people, his death is both powerful and effective to save them, and when they hear the gospel generally preached to all men, those who are called and chosen will respond in faith and obedience, all of which are fruits procured by the death of Christ himself on their behalf. That is to say, the blood of Christ conquers the sin of unbelief and turns it into faith. Arminianism, on the other hand, believes that the sinner dead in trespasses and sins must supply the faith himself (or at least, that his will is the determining factor,) meaning that Christ’s death has not fully washed his mind and renewed his conscience. Without the doctrine of particular redemption, then, there is not a full atonement.

  1. Arminianism and Evangelism

Arminians say that sinners are commanded, therefore they must be able; Hyper-Calvinists say they cannot be able, therefore they must not be commanded. But Scripture and Calvinism sets forth both man’s inability and his duty-and both truths are a necessary part of evangelism.” (106)

The thing which most sticks out for us in our present day, as fifty years ago when Murray wrote this book, is the contrast between the modern method of evangelism and Spurgeon’s gospel-preaching. Spurgeon did not try to make conversion into an easy thing by boiling it down to a decision for the better of two options. His God was bigger than that. Rather, he would forcefully preach the inability of the hearers to respond, followed by a command to repent and believe the gospel. Murray supplies another quotation from Spurgeon,

We may lay God’s commands, like an axe, to the root of the tree, but, reasonable as these commands are, you will still refuse to give God his due; you will go on in your sins; you will not come to him that you may have life; and it is here that the Spirit of God must come in to work on the souls of the elect to make them willing in the day of His power. But oh! In God’s name, I warn you that, if, after hearing this command, you do, as I know you will do, without His Spirit, continue to refuse obedience to so reasonable a gospel, you shall find at last that it will be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah; than for you; for had the things which are preached in London been proclaimed in Sodom and Gomorrah, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. Woe unto you, inhabitants of London!…I charge you by the living God…obey this divine message and you shall have eternal life; but refuse it, and on your own heads be your blood forever and ever!” (107)

What a contrast we find in such quotations with the easy-believism of our day. As in the day when Murray wrote this book, we find little that will stand the test if this kind of preaching is the model of gospel-preaching. Spurgeon preached both the necessity of believing and the hearers’ natural inability to believe with equal fervency, with glorious results. Could we do that in our preaching? What might happen if we did?

The other aspect of his preaching which is noted by Murray in contrast to the Arminian type of evangelism is his emphasis on regeneration. Spurgeon believed, based on Scriptural teaching, that only a life-giving miracle of the Holy Spirit can raise a sinner dead in sin and unbelief to life in Christ. He did not shy away from preaching this doctrine even to the unconverted, because he believed that to make the hearers’ eternal destiny seem to depend on their own decision-making would be to invite false conversion and impiety. I find this aspect of his preaching to be convicting. How many of us of the Reformed or Calvinistic persuasion make a point of preaching on the topic of regeneration, and how do we associate this topic with the gospel? Yet so many of the great evangelists of old have preached on regeneration as the other side of the coin from the “free offer.” George Whitefield and the great awakening comes to mind. What would a ministry of the word look like in this day and age if it had a similar emphasis on regeneration by the Spirit of God?

  1. The Downgrade

The one other aspect or controversy of Spurgeon’s ministry that I would like to touch on regards is that which Murray calls the “Downgrade.” The Baptist Union of which Spurgeon had been a part and among which he had ministered for several years had undergone such change that the doctrine of the infallibility of Scripture was being undermined. Although Spurgeon has been accused by some of separating from the Union over his rigid adherance to Calvinism, Spurgeon’s own quotations show that this was far from the truth. He was fighting over the very foundation of Christian truth, that Scripture is the only and the inerrant rule for the faith and practice of the church, a position which was being actively weakened and undermined at the time in the Baptist Union of which the Metropolitan Tabernacle was a part. I find it instructive and interesting that Spurgeon’s main concern in this controversy was such that he laid aside, if you will, the debate between Calvinists and Arminians in order to defend the position of Scripture in the Christian church. It seems that Spurgeon would have been content to continue serving in a Union which included some Arminians, doubtlessly in an attempt to win them over to a more biblical view of salvation, if it could only be agreed that the sixty-six books of Holy Scripture were the inerrant and infallible authority. This episode offers a glimpse into Spurgeon’s view of fellowship between the churches. I personally find it instructive as one who serves in a conference which includes a diversity of views on the topic of soteriology. In what ways are Spurgeon’s efforts at finding unity in a common view of Scripture as inerrant and divinely inspired to be imitated? Or is it regretful in some way that he tried to remain an influence on the Union for as long as he did? I find the question of where to draw the line in terms of fellowship between churches to be one of the trickiest knots facing Christian churches today. Where do you balance the safety of high standards of doctrinal purity with the desire to be an influence on a broader range of churches through fellowship? Spurgeon’s example is something I will be chewing on for insights into this conundrum.   

I would highly appreciate your comments below.  My intent is to get a discussion going. –RF 

Categories: The Ministry | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Blog at WordPress.com.