How the West Was Lost, by the Presbyterians


The smallness of the Reformed/Presbyterian community of churches in comparison to the larger evangelical American context is largely a consequence of a failure to plant and maintain churches among those Scot-Irish Presbyterians who settled in the Appalachian mountain chain and kept heading west from there.  It’s no secret that the Presbyterians lagged far behind the Baptists and Methodists, not to mention new groups like the Cambellites, in planting churches where people had settled in the west. They saw the problem, and tried to remedy it by forming a Plan of Union with their Congregationalist cousins to the north for planting churches in the West.  It didn’t work.  Perhaps nothing more could be done.

It’s just that the Presbyterian/Congregationalist emphasis on an educated ministry slowed the rate of growth on the frontier based on the number of licentiates that were available.  Meanwhile the Baptists and Methodists would find a young man with gifts, give him a Bible, two or three more books, and send him on a horse off to preach wherever he found people who would listen.  Who could compete with that speed and agility and maintain doctrinal integrity?

If you trace the areas where the Scot-Irish and their descendants (who were almost all Presbyterian in the beginning) settled first in America, and shaped the culture that newcomers would find and assimilate into, it extends from western Pennsylvania down to the western Carolinas, and west from there through southern Ohio, south Indiana, sKentucky, Tennessee, Missouri, Arkansas, South Kansas, and the North Texas Hill Country. Not to mention that these people were dominant in the initial settlements all over the far west extending to eastern Oregon. Now imagine if the dominant Christian churches over this vast region were Presbyterian.

Categories: History | Tags: , , , | 5 Comments

Post navigation

5 thoughts on “How the West Was Lost, by the Presbyterians

  1. Donald Hancock

    I find this to be a misleading article on many fronts. Who wrote it?

  2. Jeremy B

    The first church planting efforts in Nebraska were by Presbyterians. The first church in Nebraska was First Presbyterian in Bellevue, NE. Omaha Seminary, once called the “Princeton of the West”, was shut down in the 1940’s, due to lack of funding. It languished during the rise of Westminster and the OPC. I think it’s more correct to say that modernism killed church planting efforts in the midwest.

    We should all get behind and support current reformed church planting efforts, like that of what the RCUS is doing in Omaha, NE

    • Thank you. I know those people well and pray for the work in Omaha.

      As far as First Presbyterian in Bellevue, don’t get me wrong. I know that there were Presbyterian men of God doing good work and planting churches. But they never kept up with the pace of the Baptists and Methodists, and this largely had to do with the Presbyterian requirement for an educated ministry (a requirement which I generally agree with), which the Methodists and Baptists did not follow. They could send out preachers much faster. I read in the autobiography of Methodist minister John L. Dyer that the Presbyterians were in Omaha first, so this corroborates your anecdote.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: