Today Bill Nye “The Science Guy” and Ken Ham, CEO of Answers in Genesis, faced off in a debate at the Creation Museum just over the Kentucky line from Cincinnatti, OH on the topic of “Is creation a viable model of origins in today’s modern scientific era?”
I thought Ken Ham did a good job answering the questions rationally, and continually pointing the viewers to Christ. He was putting presuppositions in the forefront, using the transcendental argument. He showed that the interpretation of the existing data is subject to the prior assumptions made by either Creationists, or Evolutionists, coloring the conclusions, but that only the Creationist view satisfactorily accounts for the scientific evidence. Ham pointed out the limits of “observational science”, making a distinction between what may be observed and repeated and a theory of origins, which falls into a category that he termed “historical science.” This is largely the same point that I have been making, for example: here, that empirical science cannot yield a theory of origins. Bill Nye was cheerful, sincere, and predictable in defending evolution from a naturalistic perspective, which assumes that only natural processes as we know and observe them are responsible for the origin of the universe as we know it. He didn’t know Ken’s position nearly as well as Ken knew his, which was at times painfully obvious. But that is to be expected. I’m sure Nye doesn’t read creationists much, whereas Ham’s ministry is largely responding to evolutionists. At times Nye said some outlandish things about the Bible and his debating opponent. I got excited a few times when Nye delved into biblical or theological topics, like God’s judgment upon those who have not heard the gospel, and the transmission of the Holy Scriptures down through the ages, but alas, there was not time in the debate for Ham to respond to all of his cliché objections to biblical Christianity, all of which could have been very easily answered by any well-informed Christian.
I couldn’t help but notice how Nye, playing the quintessential naturalist, reveled excitedly in not knowing the answer to very basic questions about human life and the universe, like where energy and matter came from, and how life and consciousness developed. Ham responded a few times by saying, “You know there’s a book that’s been published which gives us the answer to that question…” Nye was like a man digging through machine rubble in a big box, trying to reconstruct where it all came from, amid broken and missing pieces. Another man (Ken Ham) is trying to show him the bicycle owner’s manual delivered with the box, which has a diagram of the entire construction, but he won’t look at it. Yet he’s just giddy about what he might discover if he keeps digging through the rubble.
View the entire debate video recording here.